IF A COURT FINDS, IN A PARTICULAR SITUATION, THAT A VALID REQUIREMENTS CONTRACT EXISTS, THE RESULT IS THAT:

(A)A CONSIDERATION (OF SOME KIND) EXISTS AND BOTH PARTIES ARE USUALLY BOUND BY THE CONTRACT

(B)THE SELLER IS BOUND BY THE CONTRACT BUT THE BUYER IS NOT (IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT HIS EXACT REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT KNOWN WHEN THE CONTRACT IS MADE)

(C)THE BUYER IS BOUND BY THE CONTRACT (SINCE THE TERM "REQUIREMENTS" REFERS TO HIS REQUIREMENTS) BUT THE SELLER IS NOT BOUND BY IT

(D)NO CONSIDERATION IS PRESENT, BUT THE COURT WILL NEVERTHELESS ENFORCE THE CONTRACT BECAUSE OF PUBLIC POLICY CONSIDERATIONS

(E)NONE OF THE ABOVE