If the two players contracted with a third player, C, that the third player would be paid 1 plus an additional 1 each time either player chose strategy 2 (A pays 1 more if a_2; B pays 1 more if b₂) would that improve the equilibrium outcome? Why or why not? Assume contracts are enforced and C cannot bribe either of the players. Would Players A and B make such a contract? Draw a new game with the new payoffs.

Player Be be be a, 40 50 Player A 40 10 aze 10 20 50 20 Player Be be be a, 40 50 Player A 40 10 aze 10 20 50 20