If we reject the null hypothesis, can we claim to have proved that the null hypothesis is false? Why or why not? A: Not necessarily, if the test conditions are satisfied and the p-value is appropriately small, the null hypothesis can only be proven false if the power is appropriately large. B: Not necessarily, if the test conditions are satisfied and the p-value is appropriately small, the null hypothesis can only be proven false if the significance level is appropriately small C: No; we don't use prove because we cannot be 100% sure of conclusions based on chance processes. D: Yes, if the test conditions are satisfied and the p-value is smaller than the significance level, then the null hypothesis is proven to be false. Note: No explanation needed please. Just the answer! Thank you