If your discussion number is odd, you will take the position supporting hydraulic fracturing: i.e. that the environmental BENEFITS of fracking outweigh its environmental COSTS. NOTE: for this discussion, please focus on ENVIRONMENTAL costs and benefits of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling, rather than economic costs and benefits (e.g., local jobs). You can mention economic impacts briefly if you like, but your post should focus on environmental dimensions. 1) Do the environmental benefits of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling outweigh the environmental costs? Why or why not? 2) From your assigned perspective, should we ban hydraulic fracturing outright, regulate it more stringently, or find ways to promote its further growth and development? Explain your answer. 3) As described above, include and briefly describe a link to an additional resource about the debate - maybe one supporting your side, or maybe one providing additional information