IHelp answer the followingquestions please. n the Miranda case, the Supreme Court held that the police must advise suspect's of their rights. Was the Court's decision a wise one? What has been the impact of the Miranda decision on law enforcement? How do you reconcile the Supreme Court's decision in Miranda with the fact that we do not require the police to advise suspects of their rights on a traffic stop when asking for consent to search? How might police coerce a suspect into waiving the rights to counsel and to remain silent during interrogation? How can courts ensure that cooperation with police was voluntary? What factors do the courts consider in evaluating whether a confession has been coerced?