I'm looking for answers for the case study 11 the misguided bond from the book "Case Studies in Forensic Accounting and Fraud Auditing". It has 8 questions:

1 - What is Martin's actual return for 2000, 2001 and 2002?

2 - What would have been Martin's return for year 2000, 2001 and 2002 if his portfolio had remained with his initial holding year 2000, 2001 and 2002 if his portfolio had remained with his initial holding?

3- Compare and contrast STRIDE with conventional bonds.

4 - How appropriate were these STRIDEs for a 78-year-old with Martin's stated investment objective?

5- Considering that the prospectus and accompanying supplemental prospectus exceed pages. Is it reasonable to expect 'Joe Investor" to digest this volume of information?

6 - How does Blink's representation of the STRIDEs as reported in the statement of claim contrast with the actual nature of this product as reported in the supplemental prospectus?

7 - Assume you are arbitration panel member. Would you order the brokerage firm to award Ralph any damages? If so, how much? why?