Imagine you've just bought a new iPhone 12 Pro Max. right when the phone came out. You had to stand in line all morning to get the phone and you paid close to $1.000 for it, but it seemed to be worth itit has an amazing camera and you're enjoying all the new features it has to offer. You get home and you show your friends what the phone can do, but one of your friends points out that occasionally when you touch one area of the screen, another area is activated. There is something defective with your brand new. expensive iPhone! There is a recent trend called tort reform, a movement which seeks to change the current judicial system's response to civil wrongs. It does this by making it more difcult for plaintiffs to bring suit and preventing them from recovering heavily when they do. This means that many states. like Texas, have chosen to cap damages at a certain amount. or otherwise limit monetary awards. Given this information, consider the following questions: lprple takes the phone back and replaces it with a new one, would you consider the matter resolved? 0 What if Apple knew about the defect, but sold you the phone anyway? How would you feel then? Do you think that the cost of replacing your one phone would discourage a company as big as Apple from selling other phones that might be defective? What do you think about capping punitive damages? Who would benefit from capping punitive damages? Who would be hurt? Do you think tort reform is a good idea