In a hypothetical state called Concordia, a group of citizens and advocacy organizations is campaigning for the full implementation of the rights granted by "Obergefell v. Hodges" within their state laws. Despite the federal legalization of same-sex marriage, certain state-level statutes and local ordinances seem to restrict the rights of same-sex couples in various domains, including adoption, healthcare, and employment benefits.

This advocacy group intends to challenge these state-level laws and policies, citing "Obergefell v. Hodges" to support their argument. They assert that these regulations contradict the fundamental rights recognized by the Supreme Court decision and impede the equality of same-sex couples, thus calling for their amendment or repeal.

The group's legal team aims to build a case based on the precedent set by "Obergefell v. Hodges," emphasizing the Supreme Court's ruling that the fundamental right to marry extends to same-sex couples and advocating for the extension of this right to all aspects of life.

Draft a legal argument outlining the significance of "Obergefell v. Hodges" in the context of challenging state-level statutes that hinder the rights of same-sex couples.