Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

In ACCC v Lifestyle Photographers Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 1538 (20 December 2016), the Federal Court has imposed a fine of $1.1 million on Lifestyle

InACCC v Lifestyle Photographers Pty Ltd[2016] FCA 1538 (20 December 2016), the Federal Court has imposed a fine of $1.1 million on Lifestyle Photographers Pty Ltd (trading asExpression Sessions) for engaging in unconscionable conduct and engaging in "unfair tactics and undue pressure" (with alleged breaches of ss 18, 21, 29(1), 48 theAustralian Consumer Law[contained in Sch 2 to theCompetition and Consumer Act 2010(Cth)]) in selling photographic products at its kiosks and pop-up stores in shopping centres around Australia between 2012 and 2014.

As a result of the Court's decision, Expression Sessions must write to all customers who entered into a contract between 2012 and 2014 to advise them that they are entitled to receive a refund.Customers who wish to receive a refund will not need to respond to the letter.

What is the court decision in ACCC v Lifestyle Photographers Pty Ltd and why did the court decide to give that decision?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Managerial Economics A Problem Solving Approach

Authors: Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Mikhael Shor, Michael R. War

3rd edition

978-1133951483

Students also viewed these Law questions