Question
In accordance with the Arbitrage Pricing Theory, assume that stock returns can be explained by the following four factor model: E(R) = R F +
In accordance with the Arbitrage Pricing Theory, assume that stock returns can be explained by the following four factor model:
E(R) = RF + 1F1 + 2F2 + 3F3 + 4F4
Below please find betas for each of four stocks as follows; assume there is no firm specific risk.
Stock
| 1
| 2
| 3
| 4
|
A
| 1.25
| .70
| .08
| .65
|
B
| .65
| 1.40
| -.45
| .85
|
C
| .75
| -.20
| 1.30
| -.15
|
D
| -.35
| .80
| 1.20
| 1.45
|
The risk premiums for the factors are 6.2%, 5.7%, 3.9% and 7.0% respectively. If you create a portfolio comprised of 25% of Stock A, 15% of Stock B, and 30% each of Stocks C and D, what is the equation for your model? Assuming a risk-free rate of 6%, what is the expected return on your portfolio?
Assume that the factors in this model include the following: Real growth in GDP (F1), unexpected inflation (F2), change in interest rates (F3), and change in expected inflation (F4). What do the signs and magnitude of the corresponding betas tell you about the stocks in this portfolio?
Factor models are one method of assessing risk and return, the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is another. How does this method that you have used above differ from the CAPM? Under what conditions would you obtain the same expected return using either method?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started