In April 2010 Mary joins an architectural firm as a new partner in a general partnership, bringing the total partnership to five partners. Mary invests $40,000 in order to be admitted to this partnership. In June, the partnership is sued for malpractice in connection with a building designed in 2009 by a partner who resigned in January 2010. In November 2010, a jury awards $300,000 in connection with the case. What is the maximum amount that Mary could be liable for in connection with this lawsuit? $40,000, the amount of Mary's investment O nothing, because the partner who caused the problem is no longer in the partnership nothing, because theknalpractice was committed before Mary became a partner O $60,000, one-fifth the amount of the judgment O $300,000, the total amount of the judgment