In Durban, South Africa, Lungile, a connoisseur of luxury fragrances, contacted Naledi, a

boutique perfume dealer with a store in Gateway Mall, expressing interest in purchasing a rare

limited$-$edition Chanel perfume, the "Chanel No$.5$ Collector's Edition," on May $1,2023.$

Naledi received Lungile's inquiry via WhatsApp on May $5,2023.$ Following their customary

method of communication, Naledi messaged Lungile back and verbally confirmed the sale on

May $15,2023.$ Lungile then transferred R$20,000$ to Naledi on July $10,2023.$

However, Naledi later discovered that the Chanel No$.5$ Collector's Edition was no longer

available in her inventory. On August $1,2023,$ she contacted Lungile and explained the

situation, offering a limited$-$edition Dior perfume as an alternative. Despite knowing that the

Dior perfume was a sample bottle and not intended for retail sale, Naledi offered it to Lungile

as a replacement for the Chanel fragrance. Lungile, unaware of the perfume's true nature,

agreed, stating "let's proceed with the deal." Later, Lungile discovered that the Dior perfume

purchased from Naledi was a sample bottle, leading to a dispute over the authenticity of the

perfume and the terms of their agreement.

$1\mathrm{.}1$ When and where was the contract concluded? Provide reasons for your answer. $(10)$

$1\mathrm{.}2$ Who is the offeror and who is the offeree? Explain your reasoning. $(5)$

$1\mathrm{.}3$ Does Naledi$$s conduct constitute a breach of contract? Give reasons for your response. $(15)$

$1\mathrm{.}4$ Which court has jurisdiction over the matter? Substantiate your response. $(5)$

$1\mathrm{.}5$ Dior found out about the counterfeit items and filed a case against Naledi. What are the

grounds of Dior's case? Justify your response. $(5)$