(IN FOURHUNDRED WORDS) Compare and contrast the Ban the Box law journal articles (Gubernick, L. (2017). ERASING THE MARK OF CAIN: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF BAN-THE-BOX LEGISLATION ON THE EMPLOYMENT OUTCOMES OF PEOPLE OF COLOR WITH CRIMINAL RECORDS. The Fordham Urban Law Journal, 44(4), 1153-1215 and Nina Kucharczyk (May, 2017). NOTE: THINKING OUTSIDE THE BOX: REFORMING EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION DOCTRINE TO COMBAT THE NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES OF BAN-THE-BOX LEGISLATION. Fordham Law Review, 85, 2803). How do the author's positions differ? Who makes the stronger argument? With whom do you are agree? Why?

http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=https://advance.lexis.com./api/document?collection=analytical-materials&id=urn:contentItem:5NJD-GK30-02BN-00FX-00000-00&context=1516831