Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

In Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld, the U.S. Supreme Court held that: Question 21 options: Even though the government was authorized to detain the petitioner as an

In Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld, the U.S. Supreme Court held that: Question 21 options: Even though the government was authorized to detain the petitioner as an enemy combatant, he was entitled to challenge his classification and to be afforded a fair opportunity to rebut the government's factual assertions before a neutral decisionmaker. The Court upheld the government's authority to try eight Nazis who illegally entered the country by military tribunal, arguing they were unlawful combatants. The use of a military commission to try the petitioner, a Guantanamo Bay detainee, was illegal and lacking the protections required under the Geneva Conventions as well as the United States Uniform Code of Military Justice. U.S. law confers jurisdiction on federal courts over habeas corpus petitions. Incarcerated captives, whether American citizens or not, have the right to challenge their imprisonment in federal court

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Intellectual Property- The Law of Trademarks, Copyrights, Patents, and Trade Secrets

Authors: Deborah E. Bouchoux

3rd Edition

978-1111648572, 1111648573, 1428318364, 978-1428318366

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

The MS between is calculated by dividing the SS between by the

Answered: 1 week ago