In Hamer vs Sidway, discussed in the book and class, where Uncle William promises his 16 year old nephew, Willie $5,000 if he refrains from drinking alcohol, playing billiards, swearing, smoking, and gambling, he would get $5,000, this landmark case stands for:

1. This contract is void because the activities were illegal, so Willie wasnt allowed to do any of that at age 16, including swearing.
2. Nephew Willie continued to do all of the activities he promised he wouldnt do.
3. Uncle Williams promise to Nephew Willie was not proper consideration.
4. Willies refraining from doing activities that he legally was allowed to do is forbearance and is proper consideration and Uncle William owes $5,000 for the promise William kept until he was 21 years old.