In ... Holmes JA held that the court will intervene only in cases where the administrative decision is so grossly unreasonable as to warrant the inference that the authority had failed to apply its mind to the matter. (1) 1 2 3 4 Standard Bank of Bophuthatswana Limited v Reynolds 1995 3 BCLR 305 (B); 1995 3 SA 74 (B); Kotz v Minister of Health 1996 3 BCLR 417 (T); Roman v Williams 1997 9 BCLR 1267 (C); 1998 1 SA 270 (C); National Transport Commission v Chetty's Motor Transport 1972 3 SA 726 (A). In ... Holmes JA held that the court will intervene only in cases where the administrative decision is so grossly unreasonable as to warrant the inference that the authority had failed to apply its mind to the matter. (1) 1 2 3 4 Standard Bank of Bophuthatswana Limited v Reynolds 1995 3 BCLR 305 (B); 1995 3 SA 74 (B); Kotz v Minister of Health 1996 3 BCLR 417 (T); Roman v Williams 1997 9 BCLR 1267 (C); 1998 1 SA 270 (C); National Transport Commission v Chetty's Motor Transport 1972 3 SA 726 (A)