In In the Interest of KT, why did the Utah Supreme Court reverse the finding of abuse against the parents for disciplining their children by spanking them with belts?

A) The court held that the Utah statutes on child abuse required a showing of intent to harm the child and the State had failed to allege or prove parental intent to harm.

B) The court held that corporal punishment is a traditional and respected form of discipline within many subcultures of the United States.

C) The court held that the Utah statutes on child abuse required a showing of harm and the State had failed to allege or prove harm to the children.

D) The court held that the Utah statutes on child abuse required a showing of physical harm and that the State had proved only emotional harm but failed to prove physical harm.