In Jimenez v. Lee, why did the appellate court reverse the trial court's ruling? Question 2 options: a) The defendant did not know he held the savings bond in trust. b) The trust estate was exhausted by legitimate expenditures made for trust purposes. c) A designation that a gift is "in trust" is essential to the forming of a trust relationship. d) The trial court must determine whether the defendant can satisfy his burden of proving expenditures were made for trust purposes