In July 2008 Miller Brewing Co. and Coors BrewingCo. formed a joint venture to better compete with the dominant beer manufacturer, Anheuser Busch.The venture was named "MillerCoors LLC." Under the joint venture agreement, Miller Brewing Co. andCoors Brewing Company have a 50 percent voting interest in the entity, and each appoints half of thedirectors. Moreover, the CEOs of Miller and Coorsresolve disputes, and all revenues are distributed directly to Miller and Coors, with cash returned tomeet the operating needs of the joint venture. Ohiolaw requires just cause for the termination of beer distributors but allows a "successor manufacturer"toterminate existing distributorships without provingjust cause so long as the predecessor does not exercise control over the successor. In accordance with the"successor manufacturer"exception, MillerCoorsLLC notified Ohio whole sale beer distributors that it was terminating their distributor ships. The distribu-torships sought injunctive relief. MillerCoors LLCmoved for summary judgment. Decide. [BeverageDistributors, Inc. v. Miller Brewing Co., 690 F.3d 788(6th Cir.)]