In Kalas v. Cook, the appellate court ultimately ruled that

Select one:

a.

the defendant was required to pay the plaintiff the amount sought in the lawsuit since the Statute of Frauds did not apply to this particular verbal contract.

b.

the defendant was required to pay the plaintiff the amount sought in the lawsuit under the doctrine of promissory estoppel.

c.

the defendant was not required to pay the plaintiff the amount sought in the lawsuit since the defendant had not signed the written agreement.

d.

the defendant was not required to pay the plaintiff the amount sought in the lawsuit since the Statute of Frauds applied to this particular verbal contract.