In Kelo v. New London, Kelo is trying to stop the city of New London from forcing her to sell her home so the city could sell the property to a developer. Which of the following statements correctly explains why one side promotes the concept of government not harming person or property or why it does not apply using some of the words of an appropriate quotation in quotation marks? Question 23 options: Kelo promotes government not harming person and property because she would be able to keep her home and so be free in her "estate from arbitrary violence and oppression." New London promotes government not harming person and property because this would permit the people of New London to be "governed by laws made, or assented to, by the representatives of the people." Both Kelo and New London promote government not harming person and property because the rights of each mut be considered. Government not harming person or property does not apply to this case, because Kelo is free "in person and estate from arbitrary violence and oppression