In McNevan v. Americredit, the employee had been fired suddenly, with no warning at all, after only 13 months of

work. According to trial judge, his work had been competent if not very good. The employer refused to provide

McNevan with an explanation for the dismissal and did not point to any deficiency in his work, although it told the court

cryptically that it just thought McNevan lacked a skill set necessary to do the job. The employer offered 3 month's

notice, which McNevan refused. He then filed a wrongful dismissal action.

What did the employee do wrong?

As an employer would you anything differently?