In Parker vs$.$ Twentieth Century $-$Fox Corp., the California Supreme Court held that

Select one:

a$.$ the lower court's granting of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff was improper since a trial would be necessary to resolve the numerous disputed facts contained in the movie studio's lawsuit.

b$.$ the lower court's granting of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff was proper since the defendant offered her an alternative and comparable movie role.

c$.$ the lower court's granting of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff was proper since no factual dispute existed that warranted a trial.

d$.$ the lower court's granting of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff was improper since the defendant offered her an alternative and comparable movie role

e$.$ None of the above