In regards of the Jorgensen v. Beach 'n' Bay Realty, Inc. (1981) case The Court of Appeals of California looked at three major issues in this case, but I would like you to focus on these two issues: (Could the jury have concluded on evidence submitted by Jorgensen that alleged misrepresentations by the agents were material? Could a jury have concluded at the close of Jorgensen's case that the agents had breached their fiduciary duties to Jorgensen?) The court answers these two questions under the "Misrepresentation" and "Breach of Fiduciary Duty" section of the case. Can you Summarize the courts findings for each of the two questions (issues) presented? Do you agree with the court's findings? Why or why not?