Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

In response to a complaint that a particular tax assessor (1) was biased, an experiment was conducted to compare the assessor named in the complaint

In response to a complaint that a particular tax assessor (1) was biased, an experiment was conducted to compare the assessor named in the complaint with another tax assessor (2) from the same office. Eight properties were selected, and each was assessed by both assessors. The assessments (in thousands of dollars) are shown in the table. Please label each part a, b, and c, and please make sure to label each part! Thank you. In part C please write the ones that apply.

image text in transcribed
In response to a complaint that a particular tax assessor (1) was biased, an experiment was conducted to compare the assessor named in the complaint with another tax assessor (2) from the same office. Eight properties were selected, and each was assessed by both assessors. The assessments (in thousands of dollars) are shown in the table. Property Assessor 1 Assessor 2 277. 274.6 289.1 286.9 279.4 276.5 295.1 291.3 267. 268.8 282.3 280.9 276.2 276.1 278.7 279.9 Use the MINITAB printout to answer the questions that follow. (Use the exact values found in the MINITAB output.) Paired T-Test and CI: Assessor 1, Assessor Descriptive Statistics Sample Mean StDev SE Mean Assessor 1 280.73 8 . 31 2.94 Assessor 2 279 .38 7.12 2.52 Estimation for Paired Difference Mean StDev SE Mean 95% Lower Bound for u_difference 1. 350 1.835 0. 649 0. 121 u_difference: mean of (Assessor 1 - Assessor 2) Test Null hypothesis Ho: M_difference = 0 Alternative hypothesis H1: /_difference > 0 T-Value P-Value 2. 08 0 . 038 (a) Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that assessor 1 tends to give higher assessments than assessor 2? (Use a = 0.05) State the null and alternative hypotheses. Ho: Md = 0 versus Ha: Hd > 0 Ho: Hd = 0 versus Ha: Hd 0 Ho: Hd # 0 versus Ha: Hd = 0 State the test statistic. t = State the p-value. State the conclusion. Ho is rejected. There is sufficient evidence to indicate assessor A gives higher assessments than assessor B. Ho is not rejected. There is sufficient evidence to indicate assessor A gives higher assessments than assessor B. Ho is not rejected. There is insufficient evidence to indicate assessor A gives higher assessments than assessor B. Ho is rejected. There is insufficient evidence to indicate assessor A gives higher assessments than assessor B. (b) Estimate a 95% lower one-sided confidence bound. (Use #1 - #2.) (c) What assumptions must you make in order for the inferences in parts (a) and (b) to be valid? (Select all that apply.) 1 The properties must be independently selected. 2 The sample size must be greater than 5 for each assessor. 3 The ass essments must be normally distributed. 4 The properties must be randomly selected. 5 The variance of the data sets for both assessors must be equal

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Social And Economic Networks

Authors: Matthew O Jackson

1st Edition

140083399X, 9781400833993

More Books

Students also viewed these Mathematics questions

Question

What is the difference between a population and a sample?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

5. Explain the supervisors role in safety.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

7. Explain how an employee could reduce stress at work.

Answered: 1 week ago