In the case In Re Score Board, Inc., the court had to address whether a contract between the start basketball player Kobe Bryant and The Score Board, Inc. was voidable. In the court's final analysis it determined that:

Select one:

a.

this contract was null and void by operation of law since Kobe was a minor when he signed the contract.

b.

Kobe disaffirmed the contract when he communicated his intent to do so once he turned 18 years old.

c.

Because he was a minor when he signed, Kobe's written request to void the contract effectively disaffirmed his duty to perform.

d.

Kobe could disaffirm the contract once his agent concluded that a fully executed contract did not exist.

e.

Kobe could not disaffirm the contract because he implicitly ratified the contract with his actions shortly after attaining the age of 18.