In the case of Bagley v. Mt. Bachelor, the State Supreme Court held

Select one:

a.

that summary judgment in favor of the defendant was proper because he failed to initiate his lawsuit for injuries within the time frame permitted under the applicable statute of limitations.

b.

that summary judgment in favor of the defendant was proper since the plaintiff executed a release and waiveragreement in which he contractually agreed to hold harmless the defendant for any sustained injuries.

c.

that summary judgment in favor of the defendant was improper since the exculpatory provisions contained in the waiver agreement were determined to be unconscionable and unenforceable..

d.

that summary judgment in favor of the defendant was improper since the defendant failed to warn the plaintiff that there was a risk of harm associated with the activities leading to the injuries sustained.