In the case of Curtis Publishing v. Butts (1967), the Saturday Evening Post ran an article alleging (falsely) that University of Georgia football coach Wallace Butts conspired to fix the outcome of his games. The article was sourced from an insurance salesman who claimed he learned about this from overhearing the coach's telephone conversation with a coach from a rival team. Butts sued the Post for defamation. What factors would be considered by the courts when evaluating this case? What questions might be asked? You can use your response to reflect broadly on the relationship between libel law and First Amendment protections. Be sure to connect your analysis with New York Times v. Sullivan (1964).