In the case of New York v$.$ Quarles, a woman told police that she was raped at gunpoint and the suspect fled to a nearby store. They located Ben Quarles and found an empty holster on him. After handcuffing him, they asked where the gun was and he told them where to locate it$.$ The gun was retrieved and he was read his Miranda rights. The actions of the police in seizing the gun were

lawful because there was a concern for the safety of the public

unlawful because they failed to read him his Miranda rights

unlawful because there was not a pressing need to locate the gun before he could be advised of his rights

lawful because the victim had positively identified the suspect