Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
In the case Riley v. California, what did the US Supreme Court decide? That the search of a cell phone was a 4 th amendment
- In the case Riley v. California, what did the US Supreme Court decide?
- That the search of a cell phone was a 4th amendment violation
- That the police had the right to search a cell phone
- That searching a cell phone is always a 1stamendment violation
- That the police should not have stopped the car at all
- When is a person most likely to be sentenced to the death penalty for murder?
- When they are a minor
- When they have a mental disability
- If there are mitigating circumstances
- If there are aggravating circumstances
- In the case Escobedo v. Illinois, the Court decided whether a suspect has the right to counsel during the?
- Interrogation
- Arrest
- Appeal
- Trial
- Which of the following cases dealt with health care in prison?
- Tennessee v. Garner
- Estelle v. Gamble
- Riley v. California
- Obergefell v. Hodges
- What was the case Miller v. Alabama about?
- Giving a sentence of life without parole to a minor
- Giving the death penalty to a minor
- Violence in prison
- Medical care in prison
- Which of the following is true about the US Supreme Court case Tennessee v. Garner?
- The police had the right to use deadly force in this case
- The suspect was trying to escape
- The officer had probable cause that the suspect had a weapon
- All of the above
- Which part of the US Constitution gives defendants the right to counsel during a trial?
- The 4th Amendment
- The 6th Amendment
- The 1st Amendment
- Article I
- Which of the following is true about the death penalty?
- According to the case Gregg v. Georgia, it goes against the Constitution
- It has always been illegal in the United States
- It can be constitutional, if done in the right way
- It is considered against the 1st amendment
- Can the case Wolf v. Colorado still be used as precedent for future cases?
- No, because it was overruled by Weeks v. United States
- No, because it was overruled by Mapp v. Ohio
- No, because it was overruled by Betts v. Brady
- Yes
- Which of the following is true about the case Terry v. Ohio?
- The suspect was found to have a weapon
- The police stopped the suspect in his car
- The US Supreme court held that there was a violation of the 4th amendment
- The frisk took place in prison
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started