Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

In the case Riley v. California, what did the US Supreme Court decide? That the search of a cell phone was a 4 th amendment

  1. In the case Riley v. California, what did the US Supreme Court decide?
    1. That the search of a cell phone was a 4th amendment violation
    2. That the police had the right to search a cell phone
    3. That searching a cell phone is always a 1stamendment violation
    4. That the police should not have stopped the car at all

  1. When is a person most likely to be sentenced to the death penalty for murder?

  1. When they are a minor
  2. When they have a mental disability
  3. If there are mitigating circumstances
  4. If there are aggravating circumstances

  1. In the case Escobedo v. Illinois, the Court decided whether a suspect has the right to counsel during the?
    1. Interrogation
    2. Arrest
    3. Appeal
    4. Trial

  1. Which of the following cases dealt with health care in prison?
    1. Tennessee v. Garner
    2. Estelle v. Gamble
    3. Riley v. California
    4. Obergefell v. Hodges

  1. What was the case Miller v. Alabama about?
    1. Giving a sentence of life without parole to a minor
    2. Giving the death penalty to a minor
    3. Violence in prison
    4. Medical care in prison

  1. Which of the following is true about the US Supreme Court case Tennessee v. Garner?
    1. The police had the right to use deadly force in this case
    2. The suspect was trying to escape
    3. The officer had probable cause that the suspect had a weapon
    4. All of the above

  1. Which part of the US Constitution gives defendants the right to counsel during a trial?

  1. The 4th Amendment
  2. The 6th Amendment
  3. The 1st Amendment
  4. Article I

  1. Which of the following is true about the death penalty?

  1. According to the case Gregg v. Georgia, it goes against the Constitution
  2. It has always been illegal in the United States
  3. It can be constitutional, if done in the right way
  4. It is considered against the 1st amendment

  1. Can the case Wolf v. Colorado still be used as precedent for future cases?

  1. No, because it was overruled by Weeks v. United States
  2. No, because it was overruled by Mapp v. Ohio
  3. No, because it was overruled by Betts v. Brady
  4. Yes

  1. Which of the following is true about the case Terry v. Ohio?

  1. The suspect was found to have a weapon
  2. The police stopped the suspect in his car
  3. The US Supreme court held that there was a violation of the 4th amendment
  4. The frisk took place in prison

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Introduction To Business Law

Authors: Jeff Rey F. Beatty, Susan S. Samuelson

3rd Edition

978-0324826999, 0324826990

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

4. What will the team agreement contain?

Answered: 1 week ago