In the first criminal trial, Jarrett was wrongfully convicted of a crime he did not commit. However, with the assistance of new legal representation, he was acquitted in the second trial, leading to the overturning of his wrongful conviction. A mistrial with prejudice occurs when legal errors are so substantial that the case cannot be retried, resulting in the dismissal of charges. Conversely, a mistrial without prejudice allows for the case to be retried. In contrast to the case of Emmett Till, where the perpetrators were acquitted, highlighting racial injustices in the legal system, Jarrett Adams was ultimately able to overturn his wrongful conviction, showcasing a different outcome in the face of similar racial disparities.

what do you like and understand about this paragraph