In the late 90s it was observed that the relative price of equipment (capital) has declined at an average annual rate of more than 3 percent. There has also been a negative correlation (0.46) between the relative price of new equipment and new equipment investment. This can be interpreted as evidence that there has been signicant technological change in the production of new equipment. Technological advances have made equipment less expensive, triggering increases in the accumulation of equipment both in the short and long run. Concrete examples in support of this interpretation abound: new and more powerful computers, faster and more efcient means of telecommunication and transportation, robotization of assembly lines, and so on. In this problem we are going to extend the Solow Growth Model to allow for such investment-specic tech- nological progress. Start with the standard Solow model with population growth and assume for simplicity that the production function is CobbDouglas: Y; = Kf'Lg'\accumulation is modied to: JKPH} K: 2 Quit 5K: where the variable q; represents the level of technology in the production of capital equipment and grows at an exogenously given rate 7, i.e. 43 : 1r. Intuitively, when q; is high, the same investment expenditure translates into a greater increase in the capital stock. (Note: another way to interpret q; is as the inverse of the relative price between machinery and output: when q; is high, machinery is relatively cheaper). (a) Transform the model (the production function, the equations for consumption and investment, and the capital accumulation equation) in per-worker form. (1)) Use your capital accumulation equation from part (a) to explain whyr there is no steady-state in this model. [Hint :(lraw a graph with the typical investment and depreciation curves). [(1) Suppose that capital per worker kt grows at a constant rate (we do not know that yet, but we will make a guess). Divide the capital accumulation equation by k, and use this assumption to prove that mic?"l has to be constant over time. (d) Use the fact that the growth rate of liefl equals (tr U'TJFl1 together with the result froln part (c) to derive an expression for the growth rate of capital AT? as a function of '1' and or only. How does the growth rate of investment-specific technology '7 aliect the accumulation of capital? [L ') Use the growth accounting equation: 7:\"- = (1% to derive the growth rate of output per worker %E;_ How about the growth rates of consumption and investment per worker? Is there balanced growth in this economy? (f) In class we noted that in the data the ratio g:- is constant over time (one of the Kaldor facts). Show that this fact is violated in this model. Is this a problem? In other words, should this ratio really be constant in this model? Or should we consider a different ratio when trying to satisfy this Kaldor fact? (Hint: In the real world we measure capital and output in the same units (dollar values). In the basic Solow model they are also measured in the same units (units of output fchickens). But in this model one unit oi" capital and one unit of output are not equivalent - one unit of output/ investment is equal to q! units of new capital. Show that the ratio between % andYt is constant. Explain why this is sufi'cient to satisfy Kaldor's fact)