In the National Franchise Association v$.$ Burger King Corporation case, the court

held that Burger King:

acted in bad faith under its agreement with its franchisees by using an

ulterior motive to lower prices.

did not act in bad faith under its agreement with its franchisees because the

franchisee did not present evidence to prove that the decision to sell

products below cost was so irrational that no reasonable person would have

made the decision.

did not act in bad faith under its agreement with its franchisees because its

plan of lower prices below cost ultimately worked to make the franchisees

more profits.

acted in bad faith under its agreement with its franchisees by requiring them

to sell products at a loss.