Question
In the reading Kelebogile Zvobgo (2020), Why Race Matters in International Relations, Foreign Policy , Why does Zvobgo think that mainstream international relations theory fails
In the reading Kelebogile Zvobgo (2020), "Why Race Matters in International Relations," Foreign Policy, Why does Zvobgo think that mainstream international relations theory fails to account for race, and is fundamentally built on "raced" concepts like anarchy and hierarchy? What is the historical context in which mainstream theory emerged? What are anarchy and hierarchy and what role do they play in international relations? If theory is our way of making sense of a complex world, what might "insufficient" theories based on unrepresentative samples (e.g. European experiences) leave us to miss in our study of international relations? What examples does Zvobgo offer?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started