Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
In Tongish v. Thomas 840 P.2d 471 (Kan. 1992) 1. The buyer (the Co-op) paid more for its alleged cover (buying a substitute supply of
In Tongish v. Thomas 840 P.2d 471 (Kan. 1992) 1. The buyer (the Co-op) paid more for its alleged "cover" (buying a substitute supply of sunflower seeds) after the seller-farmer breached. Why might this not have been a clear financial loss for the Coop
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started