Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

In Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc. Wal-Mart was sued by Samara for copying and selling a children=s clothing line that incorporated a unique

In Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc. Wal-Mart was sued by Samara for copying and selling a children=s clothing line that incorporated a unique de At the request of Wal-Mart, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear Wal-Mart's appeal of the lower court decisions which resulted in a verdict agains Wal-Mart. Which of the following is correct? O A. The court held in favor of Wal-Mart because the Samara clothing design had not taken on secondary meaning and, therefore, could not be protected as a trademark. O B. The court held in favor of Samara because Wal-Mart had copied the Samara clothing design without any changes whatsoever. O C. The court held in favor of Wal-Mart and found that clothing design cannot be protected under federal trademark law. O D. The court held in favor of Samara and found that the uniqueness of the clothing design satisfied the distinctiveness requirement necessary to have a trademark under federal trademark law. O E. None of the alternative answers is correct.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Finance At Work

Authors: Valérie Boussard

1st Edition

113820403X, 978-1138204034

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions