Question
In which case did the Court decide that the conduct by the defendant might cause confusion, but was not necessarily misleading or deceptive within the
In which case did the Court decide that the conduct by the defendant might cause confusion, but was not necessarily misleading or deceptive within the meaning of s52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), now s18 of the Australian Consumer Law:
Group of answer choices
(A) Taco Company of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd 1982.
(B) McDonald's System of Australia Pty Ltd v McWilliams Wines Pty Ltd 1980.
(C) Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd 1982.
(D) Henjo Investments Pty Ltd v Collins Marrickville Pty Ltd 1988.
(E) TPC v The Vales Wine Company Pty Ltd & Ors 1996.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started