In your case, all the p-values are greater than 0.05, suggesting that there are no statistically significant differences between the groups you're comparing. The t-values also suggest small differences between the groups. So, in simple terms, your results suggest that there's no significant difference between the groups you've tested. For the VR vs. imaginal condition, the t-value is -0.715, with a Ptukey value of 0.755 and a Pholm value of 1.000, indicating no significant difference between the two conditions. For the VR vs. in_vivo condition, the t-value is -0.356, with a Ptukey value of 0.933 and a Pholm value of 1.000, also indicating no significant difference. Lastly, for the imaginal vs. in_vivo condition, the t-value is 0.373, with a Ptukey value of 0.926 and a Pholm value of 1.000, again showing no significant difference. In all comparisons, the p-values are greater than the typical significance level of 0.05, suggesting that the differences observed are likely due to chance rather than a true difference in the populations. summarise it in APA format