Indiana Law: One is liable for the tort of battery if "(a) he acts intending to cause a harmful or offensive contact with the person of the other or third person, or an imminent apprehension of such contact, and (b) a harmful contact with the person of the other directly or indirectly results." Mullins v. Parkview Hosp., Inc., 865 N.E.2d 608, 610 (Ind.2007) (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts 13 (1965)). "A touching, however slight, may constitute an assault and battery." Knight v. Ind. Ins. Co., 871 N.E.2d 357, 362 (Ind.Ct.App.2007). Singh v. Lyday, 889 N.E.2d 342 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). One fine fall day Jack and Diane drive to Indiana to visit a pumpkin patch. They see the absolute best, most perfect pumpkin in the field. As Jack reaches for it, Trey reaches for the exact same pumpkin. Instead of looking for another pumpkin, Trey becomes irate and punches Jack in the nose. Jack wants to sue Trey for battery. Your job is to see if Trey's conduct constitutes battery. Your analysis of whether Trey's conduct constitutes battery (applying the facts to the elements of the law indiana