Instructions: Each student in the group is to select one of the following roles in the case study, depending on the size of the group: 1. Plaintiff/Appellant 2. Defendant/Respondent 3. Court Where the group comprises less than three members, each student will select one of the first two roles and then jointly address the third role. Your group will be required to read the summary of your assigned case and then each group member will analyse it in the context and perspective of their selected role by: v Identifying the legal issue(s) relevant to the selected role, arising from the given scenario or case study Identifying the appropriate legal rules that are relevant in that context Applying the law to the facts in the selected context Reaching a reasoned conclusion that is relevant in the selected context. 3) Rentokil Pty Ltd v Lee (1995) 66 SASR 301 Read the relevant court decision and prepare the written report as instructed above The completed presentation will have the arguments made from the plaintiff's perspective, arguments made from the defendant's perspective and the ultimate findings of the court. You will be expected to detail the different circumstances, perspectives and arguments of the parties to the court action and describe the judgement of the court as well as the court's reasoning on which the judgement is based (the ratio decidendi)