Instructions:

For all of the following questions, use as much space as you deem appropriate to thoroughly answer the question. Answers must be logically organized, comprehensive, and thorough. Ensure that sentences are structured and words are chosen to communicate ideas clearly, and that ideas are sequenced and transitioned logically to make your ideas clear and concise. Ensure that your final document is professionally formatted, i.e. fonts and margins are consistently used, and bullets (if used) are properly structured.

In all instances, be specific and provide supporting evidence from the case study, the PMBOK, and course materials. You may leverage all knowledge gained throughout this program. Your depth of analysis, understanding and thorough application of the program material are the critical items being assessed.

Questions:

1. Conduct a Lessons Learned analysis on this project, specifying what went well and what did not go well. Provide the root cause of each issue identified. What are the top factors that you feel contributed to the failure of this project? (5 points)

1. make a Stakeholder Register and conduct a stakeholder analysis for this project. Who are your most critical stakeholders? Explain. (5 points)

1. Describe this project's governance and team structure. How effective are these? What changes would you make to the governance and/or team structure if you were to run this project to effectively meet the project objectives? (5 points)

1. Make a stakeholder engagement plan that addresses the issues you have identified and would set up a project such as this one to effectively meet the project objectives. (5 points)

1. make a communication and change management plan to effectively meet the project objectives. (5 points)

Each of the questions will be graded using the following rubric.

Grade	Description
5	Demonstrates complete understanding of the problem/theory required. All requirements of task are included. Application of course concepts is thorough.
4	Demonstrates considerable understanding of the problem/theory required. All requirements of task are included. Application of course concepts is mostly evident.
3	Demonstrates good understanding of the problem/theory required. Many requirements of the task are included. Application of course concepts is somewhat evident.
2	Demonstrates partial understanding of the problem/theory required. Several requirements of the task are missing. Application of course concepts is limited.
1	Demonstrates little understanding of the problem/theory required. Most requirements of the task are missing. Lacks application of course concepts.
0	Demonstrates a lack of understanding of the problem/theory required, or no response provided.

Case Study:

Read the following case study taken from the Catalogue of Catastrophe, as well as the background information, then answer the questions related to the case study in this document. Submit your This entire via Turninin in BrightSpace by the due date.

Super-League Soccer

Posted onApril 24,byadmin

The following entry is a record in the "Catalogue of Catastrophe" -a list of failed or troubled projects from around the world.

Organization:Super League Project type :Establishment of a newprofessional sports league Project name :Super League Date :Apr 2021 Cost :Unknown

Synopsis :

The public announcement of a new project can be a significant milestone. It's an opportunity to draw media attention and generate some buzz about an upcoming product. When done well it leaves the target stakeholders intrigued and eager for launch day to come.

Sadly, this week's launch of the new European soccer super-league earns it a nomination for the millennium's worst launch.With fanfare, twelve of Europe's top soccer teams announced they were forming a new league. The plan was made public on 18^thApr 2021, but sinking like the proverbial lead balloon, the idea lasted just 2 days before being kicked to the curb!

According to reporting from the BBC: "The idea was for the clubs to remain in their national leagues, but also to play each other in a new midweek European competition, which would have rivalled the Champions League. The ESL would have had 20 teams, of which 15 founding members would be permanent and never face relegation. Five other sides would qualify each year."

Such a plan triggered concern from fans, governing bodies and even at the highest levels of European governments. One immediate concern was the teams who can't be relegated to a lower league would result in less competition and chip away at the very heart of the merit based system upon which European soccer has been based for more than a hundred years: Teams that win rise up through the leagues. Teams who lose drop down.

The negative reaction seems to have come as a surprise to those behind the project. The billionaire owners of the teams were left embarrassed and spurned. Speaking via video to the fans of Liverpool FC, owner John Henry said

"I want to apologise to all the supporters of Liverpool football club ... it should be said the project was never going to stand a chance without the support of fans ... over the past 48 hours you were very clear it would not stand - we heard you. I heard you. I'm sorry ... I alone am responsible for the unnecessary negativity brought forward over the past couple of days. It's something I won't forget and shows the power the fans have today and will rightly continue to have."

Henry is indeed right and the project should act as a reminder toall those in the executive suit: Oftentimes the most important decision makers aren't in the room - That is the consumers.

Reference link:https://calleam.com/WTPF/?p=9334

Background Information:

Super League: Why have the plans collapsed?

Published 21 April 2021

Plans for a new football European Super League (ESL) have collapsed, following the withdrawal of most of the teams involved.

The decision follows a massive backlash against the league, which had the support of some of the world's biggest clubs.

What was the idea behind the Super League?

Six English Premier League teams had signed up to the ESL - Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United and Tottenham.

They joined AC Milan, Atletico Madrid, Barcelona, Inter Milan, Juventus and Real Madrid as founder members.

The idea was for the clubs to remain in their national leagues, but also to play each other in a new midweek European competition, which would have rivalled the Champions League.

The ESL would have had 20 teams, of which 15 founding members would be permanent and never face relegation. Five other sides would qualify each year.

What's now happened?

All six English Premier League clubs dropped out of the project on Tuesday night.

They have now been followed by Atletico Madrid in Spain and Italian team Inter Milan.

One of the chief movers behind the ESL, Juventus chairman Andrea Agnelli, has now admitted that the ESL is not likely to go ahead.

"I remain convinced of the beauty of that project," he said. "But evidently no, I don't think that project is now still up and running."

• ESL 'cannot now proceed'
• How football's volatile 72 hours unfolded

Why was the plan so controversial?

With 15 teams in the ESL not facing qualification or relegation, critics said it would have devalued the game because it was unfair and uncompetitive.

For instance, Arsenal have not qualified for the Champions League since the 2016-17 season, but they would have been guaranteed a place - regardless of how they performed in the domestic league.

However, a future winner of the Premier League would not necessarily have qualified for the ESL if they were not a permanent member.

If this were the case, that team would miss out on millions of pounds in revenue.

The ESL attracted widespread criticism from pundits, players, MPs and most football bodies not involved.

Fans of the clubs involved held several protests outside their grounds.

IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES

Image caption:Chelsea fans protest against plans for a European Super League ahead of the club's game against Brighton

Why did the English teams drop out?

It appears they were taken aback by the strength of criticism.

Arsenal apologised in an open letter to their fans and said they had "made a mistake", adding they were withdrawing after listening to supporters and the "wider football community".

Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy said the club regretted the "anxiety and upset" caused by the proposal.

Manchester United said they had "listened carefully to the reaction from our fans, the UK government and other key stakeholders," in making their decision.

Why did the teams want a Super League?

Real Madrid president Florentino Perezhad claimed it would "save football", at a time when young people are "no longer interested" because of "a lot of poor quality games".

The founding clubs were promised a share of a 3.5bn (3bn) grant, provided by investment bank JP Morgan.

Most are in considerable debt,made worse by the Covid pandemic, due to disrupted fixtures and a lack of spectators.

Big clubs also have superstar players with multi-million pound salaries.

If they could guarantee taking part in a major European football competition every year, they would have become more valuable and stable businesses.

• Super League makes financial sense for top clubs

How would it have worked?

The 20-team league would have been split into two groups of 10, playing each other at home and away.

The top three in each group would have qualified for the quarter-finals, with the fourth and fifth-placed teams competing in a two-legged play-off for the two remaining spots.

It would then have the same two-leg knockout format used in the Champions League, with a final in May.

What have football's ruling bodies said?

The president of Uefa (the Union of European Football Associations), Aleksander Ceferin, had warned that participating clubs could be banned from European competition, and their players prevented from appearing at the Euros and the World Cup.

Mr Ceferin welcomed the English clubs' reversal, saying, "the important thing now is that we move on, rebuild the unity that the game enjoyed before this, and move forward together".

Reference link:Super League: Why have the plans collapsed?

European Super League: All six Premier League teams withdraw from competition

Last updated on21 April 2021

Chelsea fans protested against their involvement in the European Super League outside Stamford Bridge

All six Premier League teams involved in the European Super League (ESL) have now withdrawn from the competition.

Manchester City were the first club to pull out after Chelsea had signalled their intent to do so by preparing documentation to withdraw.

The other four sides - Arsenal, Liverpool, Manchester United and Tottenham - have all now followed suit.

Italian side Inter Milan are also set to withdraw as they no longer wish to be involved with the project.

BBC Sport understands bosses at the Serie A club are preparing for their exit following Tuesday night's dramatic developments.

• How football's volatile 48 hours unfolded

The 12-team Super League, set up by the seven afore-mentioned teams and Spain's Atletico Madrid, Barcelona and Real Madrid and Italy's AC Milan and Juventus wasannounced on Sundayto widespread condemnation.

"Despite the announced departure of the English clubs, forced to take such decisions due to the pressure put on them, we are convinced our proposal is fully aligned with European law and regulations," the ESL said on Wednesday, adding it was "convinced that the current status quo of European football needs to change".

In an interview with Italian newspaper la Repubblica, Juventus chairman Andrea Agnelli said the remaining clubs will "press ahead" and the project still had "a 100% chance of being a success".,

"Real Madrid president Florentino Perez is insisting on the idea of keeping the group together to push for change," says Spanish football expert Guillem Balague.

Liverpool owner John W Henry apologises in message to fans

"Barcelona say they agreed to the ESL, but only if the Season Ticket Holders Assembly approve it, which could be their way out."

Balague also says Atletico Madrid are meeting on Wednesday morning to review their position.

• 'Owners of big six must beg for forgiveness'
• Super League unravels; Woodward to resign - how dramatic evening unfolded

Manchester City confirmed they have "formally enacted the procedures to withdraw" from the Super League.

Liverpool said their involvement in the proposed breakaway league "has been discontinued".

Manchester United said they had "listened carefully to the reaction from our fans, the UK government and other key stakeholders" in making their decision to not take part.

Arsenal apologised in an open letter to their fans and said they had "made a mistake", adding they were withdrawing after listening to them and the "wider football community".

Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy said the club regretted the "anxiety and upset" caused by the proposal.

Chelsea confirmed they have "begun the formal procedures for withdrawal from the group" that they only joined "late last week".

'Admirable to admit a mistake ' - Uefa

Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin welcomed the reversal, adding: "I said yesterday that it is admirable to admit a mistake and these clubs made a big mistake.

"But they are back in the fold now and I know they have a lot to offer not just to our competitions but to the whole of the European game.

"The important thing now is that we move on, rebuild the unity that the game enjoyed before this and move forward together."

UK Prime Minister Boris Johnsonposted on Twitter:"I welcome last night's announcement. This is the right result for football fans, clubs, and communities across the country. We must continue to protect our cherished national game."

Labour leader Keir Starmeraddedthat this "must be a watershed moment, where we change our game to put fans first again", while Liberal Democrats leader Ed Daveytweeted:"This must be the start of a fans-led football revolution."

In a statement, the European Super League said: "Given the current circumstances we shall reconsider the most appropriate steps to reshape the project, always having in mind our goals of offering fans the best experience possible while enhancing solidarity payments for the entire football community."

English football's 'big six' were part of a group that announced plans to form the breakaway league, which they hoped to establish as a new midweek competition.

It was condemned by fans, football authorities and government ministers in the UK and across Europe by Uefa and league associations.

Around 1,000 fans gathered outside Chelsea's Stamford Bridge groundbefore their game against Brighton on Tuesdayto protest at their club's involvement.

Chelsea legend Petr Cech pleaded with fans to disperse outside the ground before their match against Brighton

Manchester United executive vice-chairman Ed Woodward, who was involved in the Super League discussions, hasannounced he will step downfrom his role at the end of 2021.

Leading players at some of the six clubs signalled their disapproval of the planned breakaway league.

Liverpool captainJordan Henderson said on social mediahis side's "collective position" is they do not want the Super League to take place.

"We don't like it and we don't want it to happen," read a message that was also posted by many fellow Liverpool players.

After City confirmed their withdrawal, England winger Raheem Sterling posted: "Ok bye."

Uefa had hoped to stave off the threat of a European Super League with a new 36-team Champions League, which wasagreed on Monday.

In announcing their proposals for a Super League that would eventually comprise of 20 teams, the 12-club group said the Champions League reforms did not go far enough.

Real Madrid president Florentino Perez, who was named as the ESL's chairman, said the competitionwas set up "to save football"because young people are "no longer interested" in the game because of "a lot of poor quality games".

None of the Spanish and Italian sides have yet released a statement after the six Premier League teams pulled out.

What did each club say?

TheArsenalboard said they did not intend to "cause such distress" and that they joined the Super League because they "did not want to be left behind" and wanted to ensure the club's future.

"Our aim is always to make the right decisions for this great football club, to protect it for the future and to take us forward," they added.

"We didn't make the right decision here, which we fully accept."

Manchester Unitedsaid that they "remain committed to working with others across the football community to come up with sustainable solutions to the long-term challenges facing the game".

Liverpoolsaid the club had "received representations from various key stakeholders, both internally and externally" before reaching their decision and thanked them for their "valuable contributions".

Levy said thatTottenhamfelt it was "important" to take part in "a possible new structure that sought to better ensure financial fair play and financial sustainability whilst delivering significantly increased support for the wider football pyramid".

He added: "We should like to thank all those supporters who presented their considered opinions."

Chelseasaid that after having had "time to consider the matter fully" they had decided that their "continued participation in these plans would not be in the best interests of the club, our supporters or the wider football community".

Manchester Citysaid they have "formally enacted the procedures to withdraw from the group developing plans for a European Super League".

Reference link:European Super League: All six Premier League teams withdraw from competition

image.png