Instructions (In-Class or Online) Discuss historically unethical studies (Little Albert, Milgram obedience study, Stanford prison study) and review the moral and ethical implications of these studies. Answer the following question: What social 'good' was the study trying to explore or contribute to? What was the negative impact of their unethical methods? What were some of the moral reasoning used to justify this study? You will be graded on your ability to critically address the topic or question and the extent to which you are able to advance the conversation by bringing in new ideas or perspectives. In your participation, you are encouraged to refer to course materials, personal, professional experiences, and external research as appropriate. Resource: SciShow. (2016, September 11). 5 psychology experiments you couldn't do today [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZ3l1jgmYrY Youngpeter, K. (2008). Controversial psychological research methods and their influence on the development of formal ethical guidelines. Student Journal of Psychological Science, 1(1), 4-12. https://online225.psych.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/225-Master/225-UnitPages/Unit-10/Youngpeter_StudentJournal_2008.pdf\ *For more details, see Learning Activity Instructions in Unit 1