INSTRUCTIONS Read the below case study and question. Submit your answer within 1 hour on the Workshop Assessment box on Moodle. Ken and Terrys Ice Cream Pty Ltd (Ken and Terrys) is a small proprietary company that produces ice cream. Ken and Terrys has 3 directors Ken, Terry and June, who are also shareholders with 26% each of shares in the company. The remaining shares in Ken and Terrys are held by 5 other individuals who are long-time friends of the 3 directors. Ken, Terry and June founded Ken and Terrys back in 1970 after meeting at a confectioners convention in the United States. However, in recent times, the relationship between Ken, Terry and June has become acrimonious. In fact, Ken feels that Terry and June want to remove him from the company, or to at least punish him for some unknown reason. Terry and June have not been inviting Ken to Board meetings, and so Ken has very limited knowledge of current events at Ken and Terrys. Out of desperation, Ken decides to take a look at the company's books. He discovers by chance that Terry and June have recently transferred company property (to the value of around $500K) into Terry's name. Ken also discovers that Terry and June approved unusually high consulting fees to a company which, upon further investigation, turns out to be owned by Terry. When Ken asks Terry and June for their clarification on these hidden transactions, they inform Ken they will use their 52% voting power to fire Ken from his job as a director in Ken and Terrys. Terry and June claim that Ken "has never properly performed in his job as director" and that he hasnt got a clue about the business. Question: Have Ken, Terry and/or June breached their directors duties? If they have breached their duties, briefly outline which consequences are likely to apply. Make sure you use I.R.A.C. to structure your answer and make reference to the relevant sections from the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and case law