Instructions Scenario: The government of Ontario has passed a new law mandating that all individuals must receive the shingles vaccine. This law aims to protect public health by reducing the spread of shingles, a painful viral infection that can have serious health consequences, especially for vulnerable populations. Task: Apply the Oakes test from the Supreme Court of Canada to determine if the mandatory shingles vaccination law breaches the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. If the law is found to breach the Charter, apply the Oakes test to assess whether it can withstand a Charter challenge. Oakes Test Analysis: Pressing and Substantial Objective: Evaluate whether the government's objective of reducing the spread of shingles is pressing and substantial in the context of public health concerns. Rational Connection: Determine if there is a rational connection between mandating shingles vaccination and achieving the stated objective of public health protection. Minimal Impairment: Assess whether mandatory vaccination is minimally impairing of individuals' Charter rights, considering alternative measures that could achieve the same public health goal. Proportionality: Weigh the benefits of mandatory vaccination against its potential infringement on individual rights to determine if the law's benefits outweigh its limitations. Conclusion: Based on your analysis using the Oakes test, provide a well-reasoned conclusion on whether the mandatory shingles vaccination law in Ontario complies with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Support your conclusion with legal reasoning and references to relevant case law or legal principles. Submission Guidelines: Conclusion: Based on your analysis using the Oakes test, provide a well-reasoned conclusion on whether the mandatory shingles vaccination law in Ontario complies with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Support your conclusion with legal reasoning and references to relevant case law or legal principles. Submission Guidelines: You may work independently or in groups of up to 4. If working in a group, please indicate all group members on the submission. Your assignment should be structured with clear headings for each section. Provide a thorough analysis supported by legal reasoning and evidence. Ensure your conclusion is well-supported and logically follows from your analysis. Cite any sources or legal precedents used in your evaluation