Internal processes of a company contribute to the company's overall effectiveness. Identifying ways to improve internal processes helps build a highly efficient organization. Root causes need to be identified. Methods to identify root causes may require substantial analysis or be apparent based on a major problem within the organization. For example, review the assigned article, "Inside Chipotle's Contamination Crisis: Smugness and Happy Talk About Sustainability Aren't Working Anymore," from Bloomberg Businessweek. Research several other sources regarding Chipotle's food contamination crisis. Create a flowchart of the original supply chain and how Chipotle supplies each of the restaurant chains. Provide your own commentary. Create another flowchart that suggests a new way to supply the restaurant chains. Review another restaurant chain that does not currently have a major public problem but would benefit from evaluating its manufacturing process to improve competitiveness. Specifically, provide recommendations on how to improve the company's current supply chain. Create a flowchart to illustrate your recommendations. Provide a summary of how you came to your recommendations. Include any formal strategies and informal thought processes you used to reach your conclusions. Provide rationale for either using or not using Six Sigma methodology, ISO quality benchmarking, lean supply chain processes, or TQM. Submit all three flowcharts and commentary for each flowchart in a single document. Provide three to five resources to support your response. While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please no plagiarism. 2 1 Less than Unsatisfactory Satisfactory 0.00% 74.00% 70.0 %Content 40.0 % Chipotle Chipotle Flowcharts and flowcharts are absent, Commentary inappropriate, or irrelevant. 30.0 % Restaurant 3 Satisfactory 79.00% Chipotle Chipotle flowcharts make flowcharts make weak connections at a connections cursory level and with several contain minimal gaps, and they gaps. Supporting are weak or sources show marginal with some gaps in understanding of presentation. the content. Restaurant Restaurant 4 Good 87.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% Chipotle flowcharts make meaningful connections, contain no gaps, and are clear and integrated. Supporting sources illustrate an understanding of the content. Restaurant Chipotle flowcharts make meaningful connections, contain no gaps, and are thorough and well integrated. Supporting sources illustrate a deep understanding of the content. Restaurant flowchart and flowchart and Restaurant Flowchart and commentary arecommentary absent, make weak Commentary inappropriate, connections or irrelevant. with several gaps, and they are weak or marginal with gaps in presentation. 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness Paper lacks any 7.0 % Thesis discernible Development overall purpose and Purpose or organizing claim. flowchart and flowchart and commentary makecommentary connections at a make cursory level and meaningful contain minimal connections, gaps. Supporting contain no sources show gaps, and are some clear and understanding of integrated. the content. Supporting sources illustrate an understanding of the content. flowchart and commentary make meaningful connections, contain no gaps, and are thorough and well integrated. Supporting sources illustrate a deep understanding of the content. Thesis is Thesis is apparent Thesis is clear Thesis is insufficiently and appropriate and forecasts comprehensive developed or to purpose. the and contains the vague. Purpose development of essence of the is not clear. the paper. paper. Thesis Thesis is statement descriptive and makes the reflective of the purpose of the arguments and paper clear. appropriate to the purpose. 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness Sufficient Argument is Argument Clear and 8.0 % ArgumentStatement of purpose is not justification of orderly, but may shows logical convincing Logic and justified by the claims is have a few progressions. argument that Construction conclusion. The lacking. inconsistencies. Techniques of presents a conclusion does Argument lacks The argument argumentation persuasive not support the consistent unity. presents minimal are evident. claim in a claim made. There are justification of There is a distinctive and Argument is obvious flaws in claims. Argument smooth compelling incoherent and the logic. Some logically, but not progression of manner. All uses sources have thoroughly, claims from sources are noncredible questionable supports the introduction to authoritative. sources. credibility. purpose. Sources conclusion. used are credible. Most sources Introduction and are conclusion authoritative. bracket the thesis. 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness Surface errors Frequent and Some mechanical Prose is largely Writer is clearly 5.0 % are pervasive repetitive errors or typos free of in command of Mechanics of enough that mechanical are present, but mechanical standard, Writing they impede errors distract they are not errors, althoughwritten, (includes communication the reader. overly distracting a few may be academic spelling, of meaning. Inconsistencies to the reader. present. The English. punctuation, Inappropriate in language Correct and writer uses a grammar, language use) word choice or sentence construction is used. 10.0 %Documentatio n Sources are not 10.0 % Documentation documented. of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 100 % Total Weightage choice (register) varied sentence or word choice structure and are present. audienceSentence appropriate structure is language are correct but not employed. varied. variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are Sources are documented, as completely and appropriate to correctly assignment and documented, as style, and appropriate to format is mostly assignment and correct. style, and format is free of error. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present