Interpreting the Constitution is an important part of the Supreme Court's job. How the Court is supposed to interpret the Constitution, however, is a matter of serious debate. Edwin Meese (Rendering, 1.14) and William Brennan (Rendering, 1.15) make very different arguments. Summarize each argument and provide a brief discussion of which method you prefer and why. Finally, use Kelo v. New London (Rendering, 6.6) to illustrate the differences between the two approaches