Is an employer negligent for failing to protect an employee from being attacked by a dog. regardless of whether the dog is known to have abnormally dangerous propensities? (See the Labaj VanHouton case.) 

O An employer has no duties in regard to an animal on the premises because of the rule that animals cannot be absolutely controlled under any circumstances, 

O An employer can be held strictly liable for failing to protect an employee from getting attacked by a dog, even if the dog is not known to possess abnormally dangerous propensities. 

O An employer cannot be negligent for failing to protect an employee from getting attacked by a dog unless the dog is not known to possess abnormally dangerous propensities. 

O An employer can be negligent for failing to protect an employee from getting attacked by a dog, even if the dog is not known to possess abnormally dangerous propensities.