*Is it possible for wrongful conduct to be both a tort and a crime?

*Is it appropriate for a person who engaged in wrongful conduct to be prosecuted criminally and then to be subject to a civil law suite to compensate the victim for the injuries suffered? (ex: O.J. Simpson case)

*Is there any tort of assault or battery committed through the conduct of a typical hockey fight? Why do some fights in hockey games result in tort actions, and others do not?

*Is it appropriate for the civil court to award damages where no loss has been suffered by the person suing? For example, in a case of trespass on property.

*An employer can be held liable for the tort (wrong) of employee duuring the course of employment.

The availability of vicarious liability has been broadened by the expanded definition of employment.

Is this a reasonable approach? Should the employee be held liable as well?