Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

It is early January, 2017, and you are a member of the board of directors of Soledad National Ban-corp, located in Soledad, California. The board

It is early January, 2017, and you are a member of the board of directors of Soledad National Ban-corp, located in Soledad, California. The board is meeting to decide if there is enough positive evi-dence to reverse the deferred income tax valuation allowance that the Company has had since it went public at the end of 2008.

From 2009 through 2015, Soledad had a full valuation allowance on its deferred income tax assets (see table below):

image text in transcribed

At the time of the establishment of the full valuation allowance in 2009, management concluded that it was more likely than not that the full deferred tax asset would not be realized. Management con-sidered all positive and negative evidence regarding the ultimate ability to fully realize the deferred tax asset, including past operating results and the forecast of future taxable income. The valuation allowance was primarily recorded and maintained because the Company is a continuing cumulative loss company, i.e. the Companys cumulative combined Earnings before Income Taxes beginning in 2009 through 2016 are a negative $4.845 million. However, the cumulative Earnings before Income Taxes from 2013 through 2016 are now a positive $1.607 million.

Highlights for the quarter ended December 31, 2016 include:

  1. A. Ninth consecutive profitable quarter
  2. B. Net loan growth of $4.9 million, or 5.0% versus linked-quarter
  3. C. Strong asset quality; no nonperforming assets
  4. D. Return on Assets and Return on Equity of 5.5% and 37.4%, respectively
  5. E. Martin P. May, President and CEO, commented: We continued to grow our loan and deposit portfo-lios organically and our capital ratios significantly exceed all regulatory guidelines for a well-capitalized bank. The Company expects to record income tax expense in future quarters assuming the Company continues to generate pre-tax earnings.

In addition, the Companys share price had performed well during 2016. From a low of $4.80 a share in early February 2016, it reached a high of $7.60 a share in late December 2016 (see chart below):

image text in transcribed

Nevertheless, as a board member, your fiduciary duty is to recommend actions that are in the best interests of the Companys shareholders. Without the reversal, the Companys net deferred income tax asset would remain at $0 and its net income would be $918 thousand. If Soledad reverses the full1 deferred income tax asset valuation allowance the net deferred income tax asset change as will the Companys net income for the year ended December 31, 2016. If the market believes the reversal is a signal that the Company has turned the corner, its growth prospects would be enhanced as would its share price. On the other hand, if the Companys future performance does not live up to the ex-pectations suggested by the valuation allowance reversal in 2016, with hindsight, investors might accuse Soledad of cooking its books for 2016 and reduce its share price.

The CFO has asked for your help in deciding if the evidence is greater than 50% that the Company will realize the $2.483 million in benefits from its deferred income tax assets.

Questions:

1. Record (bookkeep) Soledads initiating its valuation allowance for fiscal year 2009.

2. Record (bookkeep) the impact of Soledads proposed full reversal of its valuation allowance in fiscal 2016. What will be the impact on Soledads 2016 income statement, balance sheet and cash flows for book accounting purposes? for tax accounting purposes? Please show any calculations to support your answer.

3. As a board member, list any positive evidence that you believe supports Soledads reversal of its valuation allowance in 2016.

4. As a board member, list any negative evidence that you believe supports Soledads not reversing its valuation allowance in 2016.

5. As a board member, based on your consideration of the evidence, what would you recommend to the CFO? Is the evidence sufficient or not sufficient to show a greater than 50% probability that the deferred income tax benefits will be realized in the future? Briefly explain.

Condensed Income Statement (in thousands) Total Revenue Total Bxpenses Laxnings before Income Taxes Income Tax (Benefit) Bxpense Net Income 2009 $ 2.951 (10.060) (7.109) 0.000 $_(7.109) 2010 $ 4.536 (4.402) 0.134 0.000 $ 0.134 2011 $ 4.917 (4.675) 0.242 0.000 $0.242 2012 $ 5.107 (4.826) 0.281 0.000 $ 0.281 2013 $12.001 (12.657) (0.656) 0.000 $.(0.656) 2014 $ 7.806 (8.239) (0.433) 0.000 $ 0.433) 2015 $ 5.002 (3.224) 1.778 0.000 $ 1.778 No Reversal 2016 $ 4.699 (3.781) 0.918 0.000 $0.918 Condensed Balance Sheet (in thousands) Gross Loans Allowance for Loan Losses Net Loans Other Assets Total Assets 2009 $50.390 (0.830) 49.560 83.280 $132.840 2010 $58.822 (1.175) 57.647 82.500 $140.147 2011 $55.568 (1.067) 54.501 90.865 $145.366 2012 $59.807 (1.063) 58.744 95.153 $153.897 2013 $79.286 (1.116) 78.170 91.507 $169.677 2014 $80.888 (1.600) 79.288 65.384 $144.672 2015 $82.109 (1.518) 80.591 65.482 $146.073 2016 $104.983 (1.599) 103.384 52.707 $156.091 Total Deposits 104.401 Other Liabilities 9.705 Total Stockholders' Equity 18.734 Total Liabilities & Equity $132.840 110.955 10.867 18.325 $140.147 118.984 7.343 19.039 $145.366 124.732 9.224 19.941 $153.897 132.844 19.858 16.975 $169.677 119.113 7.118 18.441 $144.672 120.839 5.397 19.837 $146.073 126.325 6.694 23.072 $156.091 Condensed Cash Flow Statement (in thousands) 2009 Net Income $(7.109) Depreciation & Amortization 0.169 Sale of Loans, Gains/(Losses) 0.000 Other Operating Activities 5.396 Cash from Operations $ 1.544) 2010 $ 0.134 0.173 0.000 0.612 $0.919 2011 $ 0.242 0.145 0.000 0.766 $ 1.153 2012 $ 0.281 0.113 2.537 0.063 $ 2.994 2013 $ (0.656) 0.336 (4.174) (0.036) $ (4.530) 2014 $ (0.433) 0.269 10.293 (0.243) $ 9.886 2015 $ 1.778 0.159 0.000 1.194 $ 3.131 2016 $ 0.918 0.224 0.000 0.595 $ 1.737 Details of Deferred Tax Assets (in thousands) Net Loss Carryforwards Allowance for Loan Losses Other, Net Total Net Deferred Tax Asset Before Valuation Allowance Less: Valuation Allowance Net Defexxed Tax Asset 2009 $ 2.488 0.000 0.000 2010 $ 2.230 0.412 0.038 2011 $ 2.210 0.272 (0.026) 2012 $ 2.113 0.272 (0.242) 2013 $ 2.489 0.272 0.393 2014 $ 2.509 0.429 0.148 2015 $ 1.860 0.411 0.212 2016 $ 1.510 0.399 0.574 2.488 (2.488) $_0.000 2.680 (2.680) $_0.000 2.456 (2.456) $_0.000 2.143 (2.143) $_0.000 3.154 (3.154) $_0.000 3.086 (3.086) $_0.000 2.483 (2.483) $_0.000 2.483 (2.483) $_0.000 SLRK Daily 1/13/2017 10 9 8 7 6 5 - 4 Thaiffet - 3 2 Volume Big Charts.com 150 100 Thousands 50 LL 14 10 11 12 13 15 16 Condensed Income Statement (in thousands) Total Revenue Total Bxpenses Laxnings before Income Taxes Income Tax (Benefit) Bxpense Net Income 2009 $ 2.951 (10.060) (7.109) 0.000 $_(7.109) 2010 $ 4.536 (4.402) 0.134 0.000 $ 0.134 2011 $ 4.917 (4.675) 0.242 0.000 $0.242 2012 $ 5.107 (4.826) 0.281 0.000 $ 0.281 2013 $12.001 (12.657) (0.656) 0.000 $.(0.656) 2014 $ 7.806 (8.239) (0.433) 0.000 $ 0.433) 2015 $ 5.002 (3.224) 1.778 0.000 $ 1.778 No Reversal 2016 $ 4.699 (3.781) 0.918 0.000 $0.918 Condensed Balance Sheet (in thousands) Gross Loans Allowance for Loan Losses Net Loans Other Assets Total Assets 2009 $50.390 (0.830) 49.560 83.280 $132.840 2010 $58.822 (1.175) 57.647 82.500 $140.147 2011 $55.568 (1.067) 54.501 90.865 $145.366 2012 $59.807 (1.063) 58.744 95.153 $153.897 2013 $79.286 (1.116) 78.170 91.507 $169.677 2014 $80.888 (1.600) 79.288 65.384 $144.672 2015 $82.109 (1.518) 80.591 65.482 $146.073 2016 $104.983 (1.599) 103.384 52.707 $156.091 Total Deposits 104.401 Other Liabilities 9.705 Total Stockholders' Equity 18.734 Total Liabilities & Equity $132.840 110.955 10.867 18.325 $140.147 118.984 7.343 19.039 $145.366 124.732 9.224 19.941 $153.897 132.844 19.858 16.975 $169.677 119.113 7.118 18.441 $144.672 120.839 5.397 19.837 $146.073 126.325 6.694 23.072 $156.091 Condensed Cash Flow Statement (in thousands) 2009 Net Income $(7.109) Depreciation & Amortization 0.169 Sale of Loans, Gains/(Losses) 0.000 Other Operating Activities 5.396 Cash from Operations $ 1.544) 2010 $ 0.134 0.173 0.000 0.612 $0.919 2011 $ 0.242 0.145 0.000 0.766 $ 1.153 2012 $ 0.281 0.113 2.537 0.063 $ 2.994 2013 $ (0.656) 0.336 (4.174) (0.036) $ (4.530) 2014 $ (0.433) 0.269 10.293 (0.243) $ 9.886 2015 $ 1.778 0.159 0.000 1.194 $ 3.131 2016 $ 0.918 0.224 0.000 0.595 $ 1.737 Details of Deferred Tax Assets (in thousands) Net Loss Carryforwards Allowance for Loan Losses Other, Net Total Net Deferred Tax Asset Before Valuation Allowance Less: Valuation Allowance Net Defexxed Tax Asset 2009 $ 2.488 0.000 0.000 2010 $ 2.230 0.412 0.038 2011 $ 2.210 0.272 (0.026) 2012 $ 2.113 0.272 (0.242) 2013 $ 2.489 0.272 0.393 2014 $ 2.509 0.429 0.148 2015 $ 1.860 0.411 0.212 2016 $ 1.510 0.399 0.574 2.488 (2.488) $_0.000 2.680 (2.680) $_0.000 2.456 (2.456) $_0.000 2.143 (2.143) $_0.000 3.154 (3.154) $_0.000 3.086 (3.086) $_0.000 2.483 (2.483) $_0.000 2.483 (2.483) $_0.000 SLRK Daily 1/13/2017 10 9 8 7 6 5 - 4 Thaiffet - 3 2 Volume Big Charts.com 150 100 Thousands 50 LL 14 10 11 12 13 15 16

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Forensic Accounting And Fraud Investigation For Non-Experts

Authors: Stephen Pedneault, Frank Rudewicz, Howard Silverstone, Michael Sheetz

3rd Edition

0470879599, 9780470879597

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

Describe some variables used to measure the value added of HRM

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Critically evaluate research on the HRMperformance relationship

Answered: 1 week ago