It is known from past experience that the likelihood that an individual has a malignancy is 0.02 and the likelihood that an individual has coronary illness is 0.1. In the event that we expect that occurrence of malignancy and coronary illness are free, discover the likelihood that

A. an individual has the two infirmities

B. an individual doesn't have the two infirmities

C. an individual doesn't have either infirmity

AT&T was running advertisements in 1990 pointed toward baiting back clients who

had changed to one of the other significant distance telephone specialist co-ops. One such

business shows a finance manager attempting to arrive at Phoenix and erroneously getting

Fiji, where a half-bare local on a sea shore reacts inconceivably in Polynesian.

At the point when gotten some information about this ad, AT&T conceded that the depicted episode

didn't really occur yet added that this was an authorization of something that

"could happen."12 Suppose that one of every 200 significant distance calls is misled. What is the likelihood that in any event one out of five endeavored calls comes to

some unacceptable number? (Accept autonomy of endeavors.)

Allude to the data in the past issue. Given that your longdistance call is misled, there is a 2% possibility that you will arrive at a far off country (like Fiji). Assume that I am presently going to dial a solitary significant distance

number. What is the likelihood that I will mistakenly arrive at a far off country?

The Ministry of Agriculture in its battle against the military worm contamination of maize

ranches in the nation has affirmed three brands of synthetics A, B and C to be utilized

by ranchers as follows: Farmers are to join precisely two of the synthetic substances to shower

their homesteads or they should utilize none of them. The extents of ranchers who selected

for synthetic substances A, B and C are individually given by 1 , 1 and 7 . A rancher is arbitrarily 53 15

chosen from the gathering of ranchers. What is the likelihood that the rancher picked

none of the synthetics?

*@27-

The accompanying table gives quantities of cases at an enormous insurance agency by kind and by geographic locale. Where midwest and hospitalization is autonomous to one another.

East South Midwest West

Hospitalization 75 128 29 52

Doctor's visit 233 514 104 251

Outpatient treatment 100 326 65 99

Figure section aggregates and column sums. Their meaning could be a little clearer.

a. In the event that a bill is picked aimlessly, what is the likelihood that it is from the Midwest?

b. What is the likelihood that a haphazardly picked bill is from the East?

c. What is the likelihood that a haphazardly picked bill is either from the Midwest

or on the other hand from the South? What is the connection between these two occasions?

d. What is the likelihood that an arbitrarily picked bill is for hospitalization?

e. Given that a bill is for hospitalization, what is the likelihood that it is from

the South?

f. Given that a bill is from the East, what is the likelihood that it is for a

doctor's visit?

g. Given that a bill is for outpatient treatment, what is the likelihood that it is

from the West?

h. What is the likelihood that an arbitrarily picked bill is either from the East or

for outpatient treatment (or both)?

I. What is the likelihood that a haphazardly chosen bill is either for hospitalization or from the South (or both)?